Your search returned 2748 results.

Insight
|
March 17, 2010

Employer CHIP Notice Will Assist Employers' Compliance with CHIPRA

The U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) released the model

Insight
|
March 15, 2010

Ohio Supreme Court’s Ruling on Penalties Ups the Ante for Contractors Subject to Ohio’s Prevailing Wage Law

The Ohio Supreme Court in Bergman v. Monarch Construction Co., No. 2010-Ohio 622 (Mar. 2, 2010) has held

Insight
|
March 8, 2010

The Ninth Circuit Clears the Way for Tip-Pooling Arrangements

Hospitality and tourism employers should greet news of a favorable Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision

Insight
|
March 8, 2010

COBRA Subsidy Extended and Expanded

On March 2, 2010, President Obama signed into law further amendments to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget

Insight
|
March 2, 2010

In Hertz v. Friend, the U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies the Path to Federal Courts

By its unanimous decision in Hertz v. Friend,1 the U.S. Supreme Court has made it more likely that a

Insight
|
March 1, 2010

Here’s A Tip: New York is Overhauling the Restaurant and Hotel Industry Wage Orders

The New York State Department of Labor ("NY DOL") is in the process of combining the existing Restaurant

Insight
|
February 26, 2010

California's Supreme Court Limits the Reach of State Kin Care Law

California's kin care law, Labor Code section 233, requires that any employer who provides sick leave

Insight
|
February 23, 2010

The Truth About Recent Attacks on the Independent Contractor Classification

In the last few years, the issue of worker classification has been the subject of numerous articles,

Insight
|
February 19, 2010

English Courts Broadly Interpret the Territorial Reach of U.K. Employment Legislation

In the past two months, the territorial reach of U.K. employment legislation has come under scrutiny.

Insight
|
February 11, 2010

IRS Rules that Employer-Provided Clothing Is Not Wages Under Some Circumstances

In Private Letter Ruling 2010-05014, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) held that an employer could exclude

Pages