Insight
|
January 31, 2012

Employees Must Be Given Clear, Actual Notice of FMLA Policies

Ambiguity and confusion can be costly. In Thom v. American Standard, Inc., the Sixth Circuit Court of

ASAP
|
January 30, 2012

California Court of Appeal Finds Employees Are Exempt Under California's Commissioned Sales Exemption

On January 24, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, issued an important

ASAP
|
January 30, 2012

NLRB Chairman Says He Will Push For Additional Election Rule Changes

In keeping with information published as part of the National Labor Relations Board’s unified agenda

ASAP
|
January 30, 2012

DOL Releases Proposed Rule Implementing FMLA Amendments Expanding Leave Entitlement for Military Caregivers and Flight Crew Members

The Department of Labor has released a proposed rule (pdf) that implements the Family and Medical Leave

ASAP
|
January 30, 2012

Is Rounding of Employee Time Entries Legal in California?--California Supreme Court Orders Appellate Court to Decide

In a matter of significance for California employers, in See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior Court

ASAP
|
January 29, 2012

NLRB Chairman Says He Will Push For Additional Election Rule Changes

In keeping with information published as part of the National Labor Relations Board’s unified agenda

ASAP
|
January 28, 2012

NLRB Report Challenges Validity of Many Commonly Used Social Media Policies

In its most recent effort to draw lines on the self-described “hot topic” of the “lawfulness of

ASAP
|
January 27, 2012

Private Sector EEOC Charges Reached Record High in 2011

According to the newly-released enforcement and litigation statistics, private sector employees filed

ASAP
|
January 27, 2012

$2 Million Settlement in Race Discrimination Class Action Against Hospital by Job Applicants

Last week, in Meeks v. Allen Memorial Hospital, a state court in Iowa approved a $2 million settlement in

ASAP
|
January 27, 2012

NLRB Report Challenges Validity of Many Commonly Used Social Media Policies

In its most recent effort to draw lines on the self-described “hot topic” of the “lawfulness of

Pages