Michael Lotito comments on whether the Supreme Court might reverse Chevron, a legal doctrine that says courts should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous law. (Subscription required.)
Rhonda Levy and Barry Kuretzky examine a Canadian court decision that determined what it means for employers when an employee refuses to comply with a mandatory mask requirement without a valid medical or religious reason. (Subscription required.)
Douglas Sanderson weighs in on a Canadian arbitrator’s decision that an employer violated Ontario Human Rights Code for terminating an employee when she refused to be vaccinated due to religious beliefs.