Senators Introduce Unemployment Benefits Extension Bill that Would Apply to All 50 States

Senators Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) have introduced a new bill, the Emergency Unemployment Compensation Extension Act of 2009 (S.A. 2668 to H.R. 3548), that would extend unemployment insurance benefits for individuals in all 50 states. Under the terms of this legislation, unemployed workers would receive up to 14 weeks of additional benefits. Those in states with unemployment rates above 8.5 % would be entitled to an additional 6 weeks of benefits. The measure would be funded by extending through June 30, 2011, the Federal Unemployment Tax assessed on employers.

According to a press release issued from Sen. Reid’s office, the bill would also update the Unemployment Insurance Modernization provision in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ( “ARRA” or the “Economic Stimulus Package”) to allow victims of sexual assault who have left their job to be eligible for benefits under the “compelling family reasons” clause. Additionally, the legislation specifies that railroad workers facing expiring unemployment benefits would be eligible for additional weeks.

This measure is intended as a substitute for the Unemployment Compensation Extension Act of 2009 (H.R. 3548), which would have extended unemployment benefits for 13 weeks only in states with high persistent unemployment (8.5% on a rolling three-month average). The original bill passed the House of Representatives last month, but stalled in the Senate when lawmakers from states with unemployment rates that did not exceed the requisite threshold cried foul. Sen. Shaheen – who led the chorus of disenchantment by writing a letter to the Senate urging that benefits be extended in all 50 states – co-authored the new bill.

Given the current state of the economy and mounting unemployment rates, this measure is expected to receive widespread support in both houses of Congress.

Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.