Yvette V. Gatling explains why other appellate courts may follow a ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia that gender dysphoria is a condition that is entitled to protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Rhonda B. Levy and Barry Kuretzky examine an Ontario Court of Appeal case that sheds light on questions surrounding contracts and conflict of interest stipulations. (Subscription required.)
Michael Lotito comments on whether the Supreme Court might reverse Chevron, a legal doctrine that says courts should defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous law. (Subscription required.)
Rhonda Levy and Barry Kuretzky examine a Canadian court decision that determined what it means for employers when an employee refuses to comply with a mandatory mask requirement without a valid medical or religious reason. (Subscription required.)
