USCIS Announces Updated H-1B Cap Count for Fiscal Year 2010

US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that as of October 30, 2009, approximately 53,800 H-1B cap-subject petitions had been filed and received. It also announced that the 20,000 H-1B Advanced Degree Exemption cap had been met, and that all petitions filed for an individual with an advanced degree from a US academic institution will now be counted towards the general H-1B cap of 65,000. 

While the current annual H-1B cap is 65,000, it should be noted that 6,800 visas are set aside from the cap each year for the H-1B1 program that grants status to nationals of Chile and Singapore in accordance with Free Trade Agreements with each of these countries. This reduces the general H-1B cap to 58,200. Unused numbers in this pool of 6,800 visas are then applied to the general H-1B cap for use during the next fiscal year. USCIS has applied approximately 6,000 unused numbers from last year’s H-1B1 pool to this year's general H-1B cap. As such, even though 6,800 were subtracted from this year’s 65,000 cap, the unused numbers from last year’s pool have boosted available H-1B numbers to just under 65,000.

Last month, the demand for H-1B cap-subject petitions increased significantly to 6,100, which may be an indication that employers are slowly moving out of the economic crisis. Based on the increased demand for H-1B petitions and the closure of the 20,000 advanced degree exemption, it is anticipated that the H-1B cap will be met within the next 30-45 days. Consequently, employers should assess hiring needs immediately and expedite the filing of any H-1B cap-subject petitions before the cap closes. The next H-1B cap will open up for filing purposes on April 1, 2010 for H-1B petitions with a October 1, 2010 start date, so employers could face serious challenges in hiring highly-skilled professionals once this year's cap closes.

This entry was written by Ian Macdonald.

Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.