Napolitano Announces Plans to Rescind Social Security No-Match Rule and Fully Implement Federal Contractor E-Verify Rule

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano has announced that the Obama administration will fully implement the federal contractor rule that extends use of the E-Verify system to covered federal contractors and subcontractors, including those who receive American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds. Starting on September 8, 2009, the rule will apply to federal solicitations and contract awards government-wide. At the same time, Napolitano announced that DHS intends to rescind the Social Security No-Match Rule.

In making the announcement, Napolitano commented: “E-Verify is a smart, simple and effective tool that reflects our continued commitment to working with employers to maintain a legal workforce. . . . As Senator Schumer and others have recognized, we need to continue to work to improve E-Verify, and we will.” Initiatives now underway with respect to E-Verify are designed to:

  • further improve federal database accuracy;
  • add new tools to prevent fraud, misuse, and discrimination;
  • strengthen training, monitoring, and compliance; and
  • enhance privacy protections.

As reported by The New York Times, support for the E-Verify system is by no means universal. Immigrant advocacy groups continue to criticize E-Verify, and the system is being challenged in federal court by the US Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, who contend that the databases it relies upon is full of errors.

Regarding the 2007 No-Match Rule, which was blocked by court order shortly after issuance and has never taken effect, DHS will propose a new regulation that will rescind the rule. With respect to rescission of the No-Match Rule, the DHS announcement noted that the E-Verify system addresses data inaccuracies more quickly and “provides a more robust tool for identifying unauthorized individuals and combating illegal employment.”

Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.