Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.
On December 20, 2013, in Pet Tech Pty Ltd v Batson [2013] NSWSC 1954, Justice Young of the New South Wales (NSW) Supreme Court ruled that businesses that want to enter into enforceable post-employment restraint agreements in Australia must ensure those agreements are written in accordance with Australian law. The decision holds an important lesson for any company with Australian operations. To learn more about the decision and its implications for employers, please continue reading at our Global Employment Law blog.